Page 93 - 磁共振成像2024年7期电子刊

临床研究｜｜Clinical Articles 磁共振成像 2024年7月第15卷第7期 Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, Jul, 2024, Vol. 15, No. 7

[11] GE X, WANG M, MA H, et al. Investigated diagnostic value of synthetic [23] KANG K M, CHOI S H, HWANG M, et al. Application of synthetic
relaxometry, three-dimensional pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling and MRI for direct measurement of magnetic resonance relaxation time and
diffusion-weighted imaging in the grading of glioma[J]. Magn Reson tumor volume at multiple time points after contrast administration:
Imaging, 2022, 86: 20-27. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2021.11.006. Preliminary results in patients with brain metastasis[J/OL]. Korean J
[12] 马文富, 葛鑫, 党佩, 等 . Sy-MRI 联合 DWI 在预测胶质瘤 MGMT 甲 Radiol, 2018, 19(4): 783 [2024-01-23]. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2018.
基化中的应用[J]. 磁共振成像, 2023, 14(7): 18-24, 48. DOI: 10.12015/ 19.4.783. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2018.19.4.783.
issn.1674-8034.2023.07.004. [24] ZACH L, GUEZ D, LAST D, et al. Delayed contrast extravasation
MA W F, GE X, DANG P, et al. Application of Sy-MRI combined with MRI for depicting tumor and non-tumoral tissues in primary and
DWI in predicting MGMT methylation in glioma[J]. Chin J Magn Reson metastatic brain tumors[J/OL]. PLoS One, 2012, 7(12): e52008
Imaging, 2023, 14(7): 18-24, 48. DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2023.07.004. [2024-01-23]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052008. DOI: 10.1371/
[13] 葛鑫, 孙胜玉, 刘文潇, 等 . 合成 MRI 联合三维动脉自旋标记成像预 journal.pone.0052008.
测弥漫性胶质瘤分级及肿瘤细胞增殖活性的研究[J]. 中华放射学杂 [25] AKBARI H, RATHORE S, BAKAS S, et al. Histopathology ‐ validated
志, 2022, 56(5): 524-529. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112149-20210617-00569. machine learning radiographic biomarker for noninvasive discrimination
GE X, SUN S Y, LIU W X, et al. Prediction of diffuse glioma grade between true progression and pseudo ‐ progression in glioblastoma[J].
and tumor cell proliferative activity by synthetic MRI combined with Cancer, 2020, 126(11): 2625-2636. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.32790.
three-dimensional arterial spin labeling imaging[J]. Chin J of Radiol, [26] CHEN X, ZHANG Y, CAO Y, et al. A feasible study on using
2022, 56(5): 524-529. DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112149-20210617-00569. multiplexed sensitivity-encoding to reduce geometric distortion in
[14] KIKUCHI K, TOGAO O, YAMASHITA K, et al. Comparison of diffusion-weighted echo planar imaging[J]. Magn Reson Imaging,
diagnostic performance of radiologist- and AI-based assessments of 2018, 54: 153-159. DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2018.08.022.
T2-FLAIR mismatch sign and quantitative assessment using synthetic [27] CHEN N, GUIDON A, CHANG H, et al. A robust multi-shot scan
MRI in the differential diagnosis between astrocytoma, IDH-mutant and strategy for high-resolution diffusion weighted MRI enabled by
oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant and 1p/19q-codeleted[J/OL]. Neuroradiology, multiplexed sensitivity-encoding (MUSE) [J]. NeuroImage, 2013, 72:
2024 [2024-01-22]. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00234-024-03288-0. DOI: 41-47. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.01.038.
10.1007/s00234-024-03288-0. [28] LI J, BAI Y, WU L, et al. Synthetic relaxometry combined with MUSE
[15] ELLINGSON B M, WEN P Y, CLOUGHESY T F. Modified criteria for DWI and 3D-pCASL improves detection of hippocampal sclerosis[J/OL].
radiographic response assessment in glioblastoma clinical trials[J]. Eur J Radiol, 2022, 157: 110571 [2024-01-23]. https://doi.org/10.1016/
Neurotherapeutics, 2017, 14(2): 307-320. DOI: 10.1007/s13311-016-0507-6. j.ejrad.2022.110571. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110571.
[16] DASTMALCHIAN S, KILINC O, ONYEWADUME L, et al. Radiomic [29] ZHANG H, MA L, SHU C, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion
analysis of magnetic resonance fingerprinting in adult brain tumors[J]. Eur J MRI with quantitative ADC measurements in differentiating glioma
Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2021, 48(3): 683-693. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020- recurrence from radiation necrosis[J]. J Neurol Sci, 2015, 351(1-2):
05037-w. 65-71. DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2015.02.038.
[17] BLYSTAD I, WARNTJES J B M, SMEDBY Ö, et al. Quantitative MRI [30] WERNER J, STOFFELS G, LICHTENSTEIN T, et al. Differentiation
using relaxometry in malignant gliomas detects contrast enhancement in of treatment-related changes from tumour progression: a direct
peritumoral oedema[J/OL]. Sci Rep, 2020, 10(1): 17986 [2024-01-23]. comparison between dynamic FET PET and ADC values obtained from
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-75105-6. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020- DWI MRI[J]. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 2019, 46(9): 1889-1901.
75105-6. DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04384-7.
[18] MULLER A, JURCOANE A, KEBIR S, et al. Quantitative [31] CARRETE L R, YOUNG J S, CHA S. Advanced imaging techniques
T1-mapping detects cloudy-enhancing tumor compartments predicting for newly diagnosed and recurrent gliomas[J/OL]. Front Neurosci,
outcome of patients with glioblastoma[J]. Cancer Med, 2017, 6(1): 2022, 16: 787755 [2024-01-23]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2022.787755.
89-99. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.966. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2022.787755.
[19] HATTINGEN E, MULLER A, JURCOANE A, et al. Value of [32] KIM Y, KIM M, GHO S, et al. Comparison of multiplexed sensitivity
quantitative magnetic resonance imaging T1-relaxometry in predicting encoding and single-shot echo-planar imaging for diffusion-weighted
contrast-enhancement in glioblastoma patients[J]. Oncotarget, 2017, imaging of the liver[J/OL]. Eur J Radiol, 2020, 132: 109292
8(32): 53542-53551. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.18612. [2024-01-23]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109292. DOI: 10.1016/
[20] 谢佳培, 张卫东, 朱婧怡, 等 . 磁共振 T1、T2值在脑胶质瘤分级及细 j.ejrad.2020.109292.
胞增殖活性预测中的临床价值[J]. 磁共振成像, 2021, 12(1): 15-20. [33] GUO Z, SU Z, WEI Y, et al. Pyroptosis in glioma: Current anagement
DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2021.01.004. and future application[J]. Immunol Rev, 2024, 321(1): 152-168. DOI:
XIE J P, ZhANG W D, ZHU J Y, et al. The clinical value of T1 and T2 10.1111/imr.13294.
values in predicting brain glioma grading and cell proliferation activity [34] RUDIE J D, RAUSCHECKER A M, BRYAN R N, et al. Emerging
[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2021, 12(1): 15-20. DOI: 10.12015/ applications of artificial intelligence in neuro-oncology[J]. Radiology,
issn.1674-8034.2021.01.004. 2019, 290(3): 607-618. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2018181928.
[21] LESCHER S, JURCOANE A, VEIT A, et al. Quantitative T1 and T2 [35] 任龙飞, 张辉, 王效春, 等 . 磁共振动态对比增强联合扩散加权成像
mapping in recurrent glioblastomas under bevacizumab: earlier detection of 鉴别脑高级别胶质瘤复发和治疗后反应的初步研究[J]. 磁共振成
tumor progression compared to conventional MRI[J]. Neuroradiology, 像, 2019, 10(9): 655-660. DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2019.09.004
2015, 57(1): 11-20. DOI: 10.1007/s00234-014-1445-9. REN L F, ZHANG H, WANG X C, et al. Preliminary study of
[22] WANG B, ZHANG Y, ZHAO B, et al. Postcontrast T1 mapping for magnetic resonance dynamic contrast enhancement combined with
differential diagnosis of recurrence and radionecrosis after gamma diffusion weighted imaging to identify high grade glioma recurrence
knife radiosurgery for brain metastasis[J]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, and treatment-related changes[J]. Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, 2019,
2018, 39(6): 1025-1031. DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A5643. 10(9): 655-660. DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2019.09.004.

·86 · https://www.chinesemri.com