Page 227 - 磁共振成像2024年7期电子刊

综 述｜｜Reviews 磁共振成像 2024年7月第15卷第7期 Chin J Magn Reson Imaging, Jul, 2024, Vol. 15, No. 7

significance of lymphovascular space invasion in early stage nlm.nih.gov/31042066/. DOI: 10.1177/0284185119841988.
endometrial cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J/OL]. [24] LE BIHAN D. What can we see with IVIM MRI? [J]. NeuroImage,
Front Oncol, 2023, 13: 1286221 [2024-06-04]. https://pubmed. ncbi. 2019, 187: 56-67. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.12.062.
nlm.nih.gov/38273843/. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1286221. [25] 王成艳 . 多模态 MR 成像对子宫内膜癌组织学分型和淋巴脉管间隙
[6] FENG J, ZHANG Y, HUANG C Z, et al. Prognostic evaluation of 浸润的诊断价值[D]. 大连: 大连医科大学, 2020.
lymph-vascular space invasion in patients with endometrioid and WANG C Y. Diagnostic value of multimodal MR imaging in
non-endometrioid endometrial cancer: a multicenter study[J/OL]. Eur J histological classification of endometrial carcinoma and lymphatic
Surg Oncol, 2024, 50(4): 108261 [2024-06-04]. https://pubmed. ncbi. vascular space infiltration[D].Dalian: Dalian Medical University, 2020.
nlm.nih.gov/38484494/. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108261. [26] ZHANG Q, OUYANG H, YE F, et al. Multiple mathematical models
[7] HAN L, CHEN Y L, ZHENG A, et al. Prognostic value of three-tiered of diffusion-weighted imaging for endometrial cancer characterization:
scoring system for lymph-vascular space invasion in endometrial correlation with prognosis-related risk factors[J/OL]. Eur J Radiol,
cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2020, 130: 109102 [2024-06-04]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
2024, 184: 198-205. DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.01.046. 32673928/. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.109102.
[8] PETERS E E M, LÉON-CASTILLO A, HOGDALL E, et al. [27] 王芳, 刘颖, 张宇威, 等 . 多模态扩散加权成像评估早期子宫内膜癌
Substantial lymphovascular space invasion is an adverse prognostic 淋 巴 脉 管 间 隙 浸 润 的 价 值 [J]. 临 床 放 射 学 杂 志 , 2022, 41(2):
factor in high-risk endometrial cancer[J]. Int J Gynecol Pathol, 2022, 293-298. DOI: 10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2022.02.025.
41(3): 227-234. DOI: 10.1097/PGP.0000000000000805. WANG F, LIU Y, ZHANG Y W, et al. The diagnostic value of
[9] TORTORELLA L, RESTAINO S, ZANNONI G F, et al. Substantial multi-modal diffusion MR imaging in differentiating lymphatic
lymph-vascular space invasion (LVSI) as predictor of distant relapse vascular space invasion of early-stage endometrial carcinoma[J]. J Clin
and poor prognosis in low-risk early-stage endometrial cancer[J/OL]. J Radiol, 2022, 41(2): 293-298. DOI: 10.13437/j.cnki.jcr.2022.02.025.
Gynecol Oncol, 2021, 32(2): e11 [2024-06-04]. https://pubmed. ncbi. [28] JIN X X, YAN R F, LI Z, et al. Evaluation of amide proton
nlm.nih.gov/33470061/. DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2021.32.e11. transfer-weighted imaging for risk factors in stage I endometrial
[10] SUN Y, WANG Y P, CHENG X R, et al. Risk factors for pelvic and cancer: a comparison with diffusion-weighted imaging and diffusion
para-aortic lymph node metastasis in non-endometrioid endometrial kurtosis imaging[J/OL]. Front Oncol, 2022, 12: 876120 [2024-06-04].
cancer[J/OL]. Eur J Surg Oncol, 2024, 50(4): 108260 [2024-06-04]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35494050/. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38484492/. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024. 876120.
108260. [29] YAMADA I, SAKAMOTO J, KOBAYASHI D, et al. Diffusion kurtosis
[11] AYHAN A, ŞAHIN H, SARI M E, et al. Prognostic significance of imaging of endometrial carcinoma: correlation with histopathological
lymphovascular space invasion in low-risk endometrial cancer[J]. Int J findings[J]. Magn Reson Imaging, 2019, 57: 337-346. DOI: 10.1016/j.
Gynecol Cancer, 2019, 29(3): 505-512. DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2018-000069. mri.2018.12.009.
[12] OLIVER-PEREZ M R, PADILLA-ISERTE P, ARENCIBIA-SANCHEZ [30] MENG N, FANG T, FENG P Y, et al. Amide proton transfer-weighted
O, et al. Lymphovascular space invasion in early-stage endometrial cancer imaging and multiple models diffusion-weighted imaging facilitates
(LySEC): patterns of recurrence and predictors. A multicentre preoperative risk stratification of early-stage endometrial carcinoma[J].
retrospective cohort study of the Spain gynecologic oncology group[J/OL]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2021, 54(4): 1200-1211. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27684.
Cancers, 2023, 15(9): 2612 [2024-06-04]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih. [31] CHEN T, LI Y, LU S S, et al. Quantitative evaluation of
gov/37174081/. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092612. diffusion-kurtosis imaging for grading endometrial carcinoma: a
[13] BEREBY-KAHANE M, DAUTRY R, MATZNER-LOBER E, et al. comparative study with diffusion-weighted imaging[J/OL]. Clin
Prediction of tumor grade and lymphovascular space invasion in Radiol, 2017, 72(11): 995.e11-e20 [2024-06-20]. https://pubmed.ncbi.
endometrial adenocarcinoma with MR imaging-based radiomic analysis[J]. nlm.nih.gov/28774471/. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.07.004.
Diagn Interv Imaging, 2020, 101(6): 401-411. DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2020. [32] SONG J C, LU S S, ZHANG J, et al. Quantitative assessment of
01.003. diffusion kurtosis imaging depicting deep myometrial invasion: a
[14] LAVAUD P, FEDIDA B, CANLORBE G, et al. Preoperative MR comparative analysis with diffusion-weighted imaging[J]. Diagn Interv
imaging for ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO classification of endometrial cancer[J]. Radiol, 2020, 26(2): 74-81. DOI: 10.5152/dir.2019.18366.
Diagn Interv Imaging, 2018, 99(6): 387-396. DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2018. [33] 田士峰, 孟醒, 朱雯, 等 . 酰胺质子转移加权和扩散峰度成像评估子
01.010.
[15] NOUGARET S, REINHOLD C, ALSHARIF S S, et al. Endometrial 宫内膜癌淋巴血管间隙浸润[J]. 中国医学影像学杂志, 2023, 31(10):
1085-1089. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-5185.2023.10.016.
cancer: combined MR volumetry and diffusion-weighted imaging for TIAN S F, MENG X, ZHU W, et al. Amide proton transfer weighted
assessment of myometrial and lymphovascular invasion and tumor and diffusion kurtosis imaging in evaluating lymphovascular space
grade[J]. Radiology, 2015, 276(3): 797-808. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.15141212. invasion of endometrial carcinoma[J]. Chin J Med Imag, 2023, 31(10):
[16] KELES D K, EVRIMLER S, MERD N, et al. Endometrial cancer: the 1085-1089. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-5185.2023.10.016.
role of MRI quantitative assessment in preoperative staging and risk [34] 赵纪福, 曹新山 . 基于多参数 MRI 的影像组学在子宫内膜癌淋巴血
stratification[J]. Acta Radiol, 2022, 63(8): 1126-1133. DOI: 10.1177/
02841851211025853. 管间隙侵犯中的研究进展[J]. 磁共振成像, 2023, 14(6): 171-175.
[17] LUO Y, MEI D D, GONG J S, et al. Multiparametric MRI-based DOI: 10.12015/issn.1674-8034.2023.06.031.
ZHAO J F, CAO X S. Research progress of radiomics based on
radiomics nomogram for predicting lymphovascular space invasion in
endometrial carcinoma[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging, 2020, 52(4): multi-parameter MRI in lymphatic space invasion of endometrial cancer[J].
Chin J Magn Reson Imag, 2023, 14(6): 171-175. DOI: 10.12015/
1257-1262. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27142.
[18] WANG Y D, LIU W, LU Y Y, et al. Fully automated identification of issn.1674-8034.2023.06.031.
lymph node metastases and lymphovascular invasion in endometrial [35] MEYER H J, HAMERLA G, LEIFELS L, et al. Histogram analysis
cancer from multi-parametric MRI by deep learning[J/OL]. J Magn parameters derived from DCE-MRI in head and neck squamous cell
Reson Imaging, 2024 [2024-06-04]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ cancer - Associations with microvessel density[J/OL]. Eur J Radiol,
38471960/. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.29344. 2019, 120: 108669 [2024-06-04]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
[19] 漆万银, 程勇, 杨述根 . 扩散加权成像评估子宫内膜癌淋巴血管间隙 31542700/. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108669.
侵犯的价值[J]. 放射学实践, 2021, 36(2): 222-226. DOI: 10.13609/j. [36] HU Y, ZHANG Y, CHENG J L. Diagnostic value of molybdenum
cnki.1000-0313.2021.02.014. target combined with DCE-MRI in different types of breast cancer[J].
QI W Y, CHENG Y, YANG S G. Value of diffusion-weighted imaging Oncol Lett, 2019, 18(4): 4056-4063. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2019.10746.
in evaluating lymphovascular space invasion of endometrial cancer[J]. Radiol [37] WANG H X, YAN R F, LI Z, et al. Quantitative dynamic
Pract, 2021, 36(2): 222-226. DOI: 10.13609/j.cnki.1000-0313.2021.02.014. contrast-enhanced parameters and intravoxel incoherent motion
[20] RAFIEE A, MOHAMMADIZADEH F. Association of lymphovascular facilitate the prediction of TP53 status and risk stratification of early-stage
space invasion (LVSI) with histological tumor grade and myometrial endometrial carcinoma[J]. Radiol Oncol, 2023, 57(2): 257-269. DOI:
invasion in endometrial carcinoma: a review study[J/OL]. Adv Biomed 10.2478/raon-2023-0023.
Res, 2023, 12: 159 [2024-06-04]. https://pubmed. ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/ [38] JAMIESON A, THOMPSON E F, HUVILA J, et al. p53abn
37564444/. DOI: 10.4103/abr.abr_52_23. Endometrial Cancer: understanding the most aggressive endometrial
[21] TAŞKUM İ, BADEMKıRAN M H, ÇETIN F, et al. A novel predictive cancers in the era of molecular classification[J]. Int J Gynecol Cancer,
model of lymphovascular space invasion in early-stage endometrial 2021, 31(6): 907-913. DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-002256.
cancer[J]. Turk J Obstet Gynecol, 2024, 21(1): 37-42. DOI: 10.4274/ [39] YUE X N, HE X Y, WU J J, et al. Endometrioid adenocarcinoma:
tjod.galenos.2024.92597. combined multiparametric MRI and tumour marker HE4 to evaluate
[22] MA X L, REN X J, SHEN M H, et al. Volumetric ADC histogram tumour grade and lymphovascular space invasion[J]. Clin Radiol,
analysis for preoperative evaluation of LVSI status in stage I 2023, 78(8): e574-e581 [2024-06-20]. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/
endometrioid adenocarcinoma[J]. Eur Radiol, 2022, 32(1): 460-469. 37183140/. DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2023.04.005.
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-07996-6. [40] OPLAWSKI M, DZIOBEK K, ZMARZŁY N, et al. Expression profile
[23] YAN B C, XIAO M L, LI Y, et al. The diagnostic performance of ADC of VEGF-C, VEGF-D, and VEGFR-3 in different grades of endometrial
value for tumor grade, deep myometrial invasion and lymphovascular cancer[J]. Curr Pharm Biotechnol, 2019, 20(12): 1004-1010. DOI: 10.2174/
space invasion in endometrial cancer: a meta-analysis[J/OL]. Acta 1389201020666190718164431.
Radiol, 2019: 284185119841988 [2024-06-04]. https://pubmed. ncbi. （下转第234页）
·220 · https://www.chinesemri.com